I recently got some very tasty eggnog. I noticed the ingredients were actually very few and quite natural, an all too uncommon thing to see in these times of artificial additives and preservatives. Anyway, I took special note of a "badge" stating that the eggnog was made with milk that came from cows not treated with rBST. I thought that was pretty cool. Then I noticed the disclaimer:
If there is no significant difference between milk derived from rBST treated and non-rBST treated cows, why bother mentioning it in the first place? Are we (consumers) that paranoid about it? Or is there something to all this talk of health risks from rBST and the company producing the non-rBST eggnog just doesn't wish to risk getting sued by Monsanto? I rather enjoyed this little clip:
YouTube Video:
Fox News & Monsanto Squash Story On Cancerous Hormones In Milk
I recommend you research the Monsanto Company and rBST. Concerning Monsanto, you will likely find many health concerns revolving around their food products.
Have fun!
"It's not that I don't expect you to understand. I expect you to not understand."
Wait wait wait... Did they say that Monsanto wanted to patent a pig? OK, that's messed up! Seriously, though, we need to put a stop to this genetic engineering crap. Also, check this site out.
User's registered... Last year: 5 Yesterday: 0 Today: 0 This week: 0 This month: 0 This year: 1 Total registered: 6 Members visited page... Last year: 0 Yesterday: 1 Today: 0 This week: 2 This month: 2 This year: 6 Newest user: jeanean Guests online: 2
Log in Zone
Statistics
Last year: 5
I can't imagine why employers may have a problem with that email as a reference.